BarbriSFCourseDetails

Course Details

This CLE webinar will analyze the implications arising out of the Fifth Circuit's decision in Excluded Lenders v. Serta Simmons Bedding L.L.C. (In re Serta Simmons Bedding L.L.C.), Case No. 23-20181 (5th Cir. Dec. 31, 2024), revised (Feb. 14, 2025), and its impact on Chapter 11 reorganization strategy, confirmation, and the equitable mootness doctrine. The panel will also discuss success factors when challenging these types of transactions and whether this decision will curtail uptier and other similar transactions.

Faculty

Description

Because it is the first circuit decision assessing uptiering, the Serta opinion is expected to receive careful consideration from other courts, and the ruling is likely to reverberate well beyond the Fifth Circuit. Beyond striking down the transactions based on non-bankruptcy contract and finance principles, the ruling reaffirmed the primacy of the Bankruptcy Code's priority schemes and equal treatment principles.

Of particular importance is that the court reviewed and reversed the transactions well after confirmation of the plan, striking a blow to the doctrine of equitable mootness and perhaps encouraging creditors to appeal confirmation orders. Because the court specifically preserved the excluded lenders' claims and prohibited indemnification by the debtor, uptiering and other similar transactions could become cost-prohibitive.

Listen as this experienced panel of finance and restructuring attorneys and professionals explains the Serta decision's impact on important bankruptcy reorganization issues.

Outline

  1. Overview
    • Purposes of liability management transactions
    • Loan terms and conditions that make liability management transactions possible and desirable
    • Lender responses and blocking mechanisms
  2. Analysis of the Serta decision
    • Preserving "sacred" lender rights to pro rata payment
    • Invalidating the plan's indemnity
    • The merits of excising the indemnity
      • §502(e)(1)(B)
      • Equal treatment
    • Equitable mootness argument
  3. Takeaways and planning for what's next
    • Weighing benefits and risks of uptiering after Serta
      • Literal actual cost in fees, etc. of the failed transaction
      • Future litigation and liability
    • Impact on equitable mootness
    • Creditor strategies and "Serta blockers"
    • Scope of impact on other transactions
    • Contrasted with Mitel Networks (Ocean Trails CLO VII v. MLN Topco Ltd., Case No. 2024-00169 (N.Y. App. Div., 1st Dep't, Dec. 31, 2024))

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What is the open market purchase exception to non-pro rata uptier transactions?
  • Does the decision put a chink in equitable mootness?
  • What protections and drafting strategies should minority lenders insist upon?
  • What will emerge as the generally accepted syndication market response to Serta?
  • Will Serta be used to attack transactions using differently worded documents if the net effect is the same?