State Regulation of PFAS in Drinking Water: Testing, Restrictions, and Liability in California, New York, and More
Implementation of Local Regulations While EPA Proposals Stall

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
- work Practice Area
Environmental
- event Date
Thursday, March 31, 2022
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE webinar will provide environmental counsel with an update on the state restrictions and regulations on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination and drinking water levels. The panel will discuss how to navigate these intersecting restrictions and how companies can meet testing and notification requirements in multiple states.
Faculty

Mr. Lee is leader of the firm’s PFAS and Proposition 65 teams. He regularly works with clients in a variety of industries including real estate investment and development, food and agriculture, retail and consumer products, and chemical manufacturing and distribution. Mr. Lee’s practice focuses on three main areas: transactional work, compliance counseling, and enforcement defense. In his transactional work he represents buyers and sellers of real estate and corporate entities that are impacted by environmental conditions or related liability, with a particular focus on brownfield acquisition and redevelopment. Mr. Lee takes projects from initial due diligence, through contract drafting, closing, and post-closing remediation and regulatory closure, all with an eye towards balancing the costs and risks posed by the environmental conditions. Mr. Lee is the founder and editor of the firms’ Emerging Contaminants/Emerging Solutions blog, and writes and lectures regularly on a variety of topics including Proposition 65 and the developing regulation of PFAS.

Dr. Rackl is a scientist and environmental engineer with a broad interdisciplinary technical and academic background in the areas of engineering, microbiology, chemistry, and ecology. Her research and work experience since the late 1990s have focused on evaluating technologies and practices related to water and other environmental media. She has applied her expertise to the development of new products; conducting business case analyses; and communicating with boards of directors, investors, regulators, legal counsel and policy makers. Dr. Rackl excels at gathering and interpreting interdisciplinary technical data and information in a wide range of scientific areas and understanding and communicating its relevance to regulators, legal counsel and other and non-technical colleagues. Dr. Rackl also specializes in California and other state-specific science and regulatory matters, including California’s “Proposition 65”, drinking water quality and supply challenges and agricultural product compliance. Dr. Rackl has particularly extensive expertise in the research, development, manufacturing scale-up and registration of biopesticides.

Mr. Gardella’s practice focuses on environmental litigation and compliance matters, as well as the litigation of products liability and toxic torts cases (asbestos, talc, lead paint, benzene) matters. His environmental work includes representation of companies in CERCLA, Safe Drinking Water Act, Clean Water Act, and numerous state level environmental regulatory matters. These matters range from litigation to compliance planning and audits to ensure corporate compliance objectives are met. In addition, for the past five years, Mr. Gardella has focused his practice on the emerging issue of PFAS, and is regularly invited to speak about PFAS at conferences, to consulting and risk analyst groups, and in-house to insurance companies and businesses. His thought leadership and predictive analytical skills with respect to PFAS risks and litigation trends earned him and his PFAS team at CMBG3 the honor of being the only law firm in the country that was recognized as a thought leader on PFAS in 2020 by the National Law Review.
Description
Many states have expressed frustration with the lack of an enforceable federal PFAS drinking water standard and have started the process of regulating PFAS in drinking water themselves. As a result, states have adopted a patchwork of regulations and standards that present significant challenges to impacted industries.
Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) set the maximum concentration of a given contaminant present in drinking water. Publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) and drinking water systems must ensure that drinking water distributed to the public meets these limits. To do that, POTWs and state agencies often include discharge limits in the permits of upstream dischargers to ensure that the treatment facility can comply with the MCL.
Without a federal PFAS standard, there is a large discrepancy between the regulatory standards established by the various states. For example, for PFAS substances in drinking water, the smallest concentration is 5.1 ppt (California; PFOA only), and one of the highest values is 140,000 ppt (Michigan; PFHxA only).
Businesses that currently or historically have used PFAS compounds or have reason to believe that they may be present in their wastewater effluent should evaluate: (1) whether they discharge any substances to water that are eventually used for drinking water; and (2) whether their discharge contains any of the regulated PFAS compounds. That information will allow those businesses to determine whether to modify their operations to reduce or eliminate PFAS from their waste stream in anticipation of permit conditions based on the different state PFAS regulations.
Listen as our expert panel discusses the current state of PFAS regulation in drinking water standards, the status of proposed federal regulation, and best practices of businesses that use PFAS compounds to evaluate the use of this chemical moving forward.
Outline
- Current federal PFAS regulation in drinking water
- Proposed Safe Drinking Water Act
- State regulations
- California
- New York
- Michigan
- Other states
- Best practices of the industry
- Mitigating liability
Benefits
The panel will address these and other relevant topics:
- What are the current PFAS standards in drinking water in California, New York, and other highly regulated states?
- What is the status of the proposed Safe Drinking Water Act?
- How should businesses that intentionally use PFAS compounds evaluate continued use to minimize liability under these regulations?
- How can businesses evaluate the risk of PFAS in their wastewater effluent from ingredient packaging and process equipment, even if they don't intentionally use PFAS compounds as part of their manufacturing process?
Unlimited access to CLE courses
- CLE Live Webinars
- CLE On Demand Webinars
- All CLE Course Materials
Unlimited access to CPE courses
- CPE Live Webinars
- CPE On Demand Webinars
- All CPE Course Materials
Unlimited access to all our courses including:
- CLE Live Webinars
- CPE On Demand Webinars
- Professional Skills
Related Courses

CERCLA Liability and Reopened Superfund Sites: PRP Impact, Settlement Consequences, Insurance Considerations
Thursday, April 10, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

City and County of San Francisco v. EPA: Implications for NPDES Permits Under the Clean Water Act
Wednesday, April 2, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
Recommended Resources
Transforming CLE from a Requirement to a Career Advantage
- Learning & Development
- Career Advancement
- Talent Development
How to Build a Standout Personal Brand Without Sacrificing Billable Hours
- Career Advancement