BarbriSFCourseDetails

Course Details

This CLE webinar will offer insurer or policyholder counsel guidance on negotiating and litigating the value of property losses using the broad evidence rule.

Faculty

Description

Property insurance policies normally provide for the payment of replacement cost value (RCV) or the actual cash value (ACV) of the insured property. RCV is usually defined in the policy. If the policy stipulates that the loss will be the ACV, on the other hand, the policy often does not define ACV, for several reasons. ACV can be (1) the fair market value, (2) replacement costs minus depreciation, or (3) the most prevalent method, the broad evidence rule.

Although it is the majority rule for determining ACV, no clear definition of the broad evidence rule exists other than the general principle that everything that contributes to the value of the property should be considered. All the factors that would be considered in any other methodology are fair game plus a virtually never-ending list of others. One of the most disputed issues is whether an insured's plans to dispose of the property at the time of loss should be considered.

Listen as this panel of insurance practitioners offers clarity to this complicated and often litigated issue of value property losses and how to successfully navigate the broad evidence rule.

Outline

  1. ACV vs. RCV coverage defined and distinguished
  2. Historical development of broad evidence rule
  3. Completing the proof of loss
  4. Factors considered
  5. Discovery best practices
  6. Selection and use of experts
  7. Effect of co-insurance or endorsements
  8. Total and partial losses

Benefits

The panel will review these and other important issues:

  • Whether specialized maintenance or upgrades done by the insured should be taken into account
  • What deductions should be made in recovery for the fact that the insured may be getting new for old (a new or improved property)?
  • Why has the broad evidence rule become the prevailing approach?