BarbriSFCourseDetails
  1. keyboard_arrow_leftBack

Course Details

Course Information
  • smart_display Format

    Live Online with Live Q&A

  • signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level

    Intermediate

  • work Practice Area

    Class Action and Other Litigation

Date & Time
  • event Date

    Wednesday, December 31, 2025

  • schedule Time

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  • timer Program Length

    90 minutes

Credit Information

  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.

$297.00
CLE
ALL

This CLE course will guide class action lawyers in asserting or challenging the preclusive effect of class releases and class judgments on future claims. The program will review what trial strategies and release language result in the broadest relief and finality, how preclusion can be asserted or avoided by the parties' successors, heirs, and assigns even decades after the settlement or judgment, and the effect of notice and other class action procedures on the enforceability of releases and judgments and the effect of broad releases on class settlement approval.

Faculty

Todd Jackson
Partner
Feinberg Jackson Worthman & Wasow, LLP

Mr. Jackson represents employees in class action cases involving overtime pay, pension benefits and employment discrimination. He has successfully served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel in numerous class actions, collectively resulting in over $250 million in recovered wages and benefits. Mr. Jackson is a frequent speaker at legal conferences on employee benefits law and wage and hour law.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio

Description

The existence of a prior judgment or prior settlement impacts both plaintiffs and defendants at both ends of the class action process. Plaintiffs' counsel must thoroughly investigate whether a prior judgment, release, or government action involving the defendant forecloses relief by disposing of a pivotal issue or entire claims. Mergers, acquisitions, bankruptcies, and the like complicate the investigation, especially years after these events.

Courts may approve releases that cover not just the claims that were or could have been asserted in the operative complaint but also related claims that could not have been asserted by the plaintiffs or were outside the court's jurisdiction. The effect of such releases is governed by the "identical factual predicate" rule that each federal circuit applies slightly differently.

The preclusive effect of a class action judgment on future claims and issues must be part of the trial strategy. The utility of a prior judgment or a release to stop future claims differs depending on who is attempting to assert preclusion and the context.

Listen as this experienced panel reviews the binding effect of class settlements and the preclusive effect of judgments on future claims by ostensible members of the prior class.

Outline

  1. Preclusive effects of judgments on class
    • Claim preclusion
    • Individualized claims
    • Injunctive relief and future money damages
    • Governmental actions
  2. Preclusive effects of settlements
    • Claims that could not be brought
    • Parties beyond the court's jurisdiction
    • Issue preclusion
  3. Problem of opt-outs

Benefits

The panel will review these and other issues:

  • How does the identical factual predicate standard differ from the "same set of operative facts" test?
  • Does a court have the power to release claims beyond its jurisdiction to adjudicate?
  • Can defendants use a prior judgment or release against those who elected not to participate in the class action, objectors, certification issues, or merits litigation?
  • What is the kind of language in a release that will provide the broadest or narrowest releases?