Negotiating ESI Protocols: Pros and Cons, Strategies, Best Practices, Avoiding Pitfalls of Overuse
Search Terms and Design, Privilege Logs, TAR, Email Threading, Attachments, Generative Artificial Intelligence, and More

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
Intermediate
- work Practice Area
Class Action and Other Litigation
- event Date
Tuesday, January 21, 2025
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE webinar will guide litigators through the advantages and disadvantages of electronically stored information (ESI) protocols and best practices for negotiating, drafting, and enforcing them.
Faculty

Mr. Atkins is a seasoned construction attorney with significant experience in litigation and contracting. He also co-chairs the Real Estate Litigation practice at Smith Anderson. Mr. Atkins regularly represents owners, contractors and developers in multi-party disputes involving public and private commercial projects. He is also regularly involved in other commercial, contract and business-related disputes. Mr. Atkins has represented clients in some of the largest construction disputes in North Carolina including multi-million dollar claims related to the construction of state-owned psychiatric hospitals, a light rail system and public highways. He regularly counsels clients on risk management issues and claim development during construction. Mr. Atkins has significant experience in mediation, litigation, and arbitration and has been involved in projects across North Carolina, throughout the southeast, in Puerto Rico and in Eastern Europe. He has been involved in numerous cases with millions of documents produced in discovery and is able to assist clients in the development of strategies to efficiently process and produce large volumes of documents while minimizing discovery costs. Based on his experience, Mr. Atkins serves as the firm’s eDiscovery Partner-In-Charge. He also regularly represents clients before the various North Carolina construction-related licensing boards and counsels them on applicable laws and rules. In addition to his litigation practice, Mr. Atkins also regularly assists clients with development and construction contracting matters including on complex projects such as public private partnerships.

Ms. Halter is a partner in the firm. Her practice includes complex commercial and business litigations, arbitrations and government and internal investigations, particularly as they relate to managing large, document-intensive cases, specifically those involving electronic discovery. For more than two decades, Ms. Halter has counseled clients regarding complex electronic discovery in litigations, arbitrations and investigation matters involving intellectual property, trade secrets, securities, and banking, including SEC and FINRA investigation matters, antitrust, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, products liability, real estate, and employment litigation, as well as other government and internal investigations and public records act requests. She is a member of the e-Discovery Analysis and Technology (e-DAT) group, a dedicated, firmwide practice group that deploys advanced technology, including predictive analytics and other technology assisted review resources, and implements proven business processes to provide clients with efficient and cost-effective electronic discovery counseling and document review services. Ms. Halter also counsels clients in a variety of industries on information governance, records management, and litigation readiness issues, providing advice and assistance regarding information governance policies, practices and records retention schedules, employee training, and other recommendations to maintain legal compliance, lower record management costs, and reduce liability risks.

Mr. Hersh is a Partner in Akerman’s Litigation Practice Group and leads Akerman’s eDiscovery Services team. He advises clients on electronic discovery (eDiscovery), information governance, litigation readiness and response, cross-border discovery issues, and data privacy. Mr. Hersh leverages his unique knowledge of the technical and legal dimensions of eDiscovery to advise clients on defensible and cost-effective strategies for data preservation, collection, review, and production, with an emphasis on controlling the scope of discovery and implementing cost-shifting strategies. He represents clients in all aspects of eDiscovery throughout the country in both state and federal court, and represents foreign corporations who are defending lawsuits in the United States.

Mr. Goodfried is a staff attorney for the e-discovery analysis and technology (e-DAT) group. He manages all aspects of the e-discovery process, from advising clients on document retention and information governance, through document production and litigation support. Mr. Goodfried has managed e-discovery on multibillion dollar lawsuits, government investigations, and international arbitration. His role also includes evaluation and testing of new e-discovery software; training lawyers and staff on the use of e-discovery software; and managing Legal Holds for several clients.
Description
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 requires that the parties discuss the disclosure, preservation, and discovery of ESI, but it does not offer any particularities. Several courts have lept into the breach and created model ESI protocols that lay out how the parties ought to search for and produce ESI. The promise of the protocols is a reduction in the number of discovery disputes and containment of discovery costs.
Two schools of thought have recently emerged over ESI protocols: one contends that detailed protocols are essential to reduce disputes and allow the parties to control costs. However, when protocols are memorialized in orders it is unclear how amendable they are, which poses significant traps for the unwary. Others have become disillusioned (or had their doubts confirmed) that extremely detailed ESI protocols formalized in a court order accomplish little. They contend that disputes over the protocols have replaced or in many cases augmented and escalated the previous disputes, creating one more pyrrhic discovery battle to fund and fight.
If the parties agree to an ESI protocol, they must negotiate an ever-widening menu of topics such as search terms, privilege logs, technology-assisted review, email threading, modern attachments, and now generative artificial intelligence.
Listen as our panel of ESI experts discusses the pros and cons of ESI protocols and best practices for negotiating, drafting, and enforcing them.
Outline
- Theory behind ESI protocols
- Advantages
- Disadvantages
- What counsel needs to know to effectively address ESI protocols
- Objectives
- Negotiation insights and strategies
- Basic provisions
- Handling common objections
- Search terms and search designs
- Production issues
- Extracted text and OCR
- Redaction and privilege logging
- Deduplication
- Email threading
- Non-waiver and FRE Rule 502
- Metadata
- Attachments
- Generative AI use
- Enforcement and dispute resolution
Benefits
The panel will review these and other important issues such as:
- When is an ESI protocol appropriate and when is it not appropriate?
- Are ESI protocols mandatory?
- How can litigators cooperate in good faith without ceding the right to conduct discovery as counsel and the client believe best?
Related Courses
Recommended Resources
Explore the Advantages of Consistent Legal Language
- Learning & Development
- Business & Professional Skills
- Talent Development