Essential Litigation Skills: Meeting Federal Standards for Pleading Plausible Claims for Relief
Complying With Twombly and Iqbal; Avoiding and Responding to Inadequate and Shotgun Pleadings

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
Intermediate
- work Practice Area
Class Action and Other Litigation
- event Date
Tuesday, July 23, 2024
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE webinar will discuss what Federal Rule 8(a)(2) means by "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief" and what happens if a pleader does not meet that standard. The panelists will also discuss applying these standards to affirmative defenses and counterclaims and how to avoid (or obtain) a dismissal with prejudice for failing to plead a plausible claim, as well as the interplay of both local rules and local custom.
Faculty

Ms. Mitchell litigates complex commercial disputes with a focus on defending corporations in actions involving complex discovery issues arising from domestic and foreign events, including antitrust, health care, environmental, human rights, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), Alien Tort Statute, and fraud claims. She represents clients in antitrust and unfair competition claims, including representing clients from the oil, telecommunications, pharmaceutical, video game, health care, and floral industries in price-fixing, monopolization, and unfair competition lawsuits. Ms. Mitchell also passed the test for certification as a privacy professional administered by IAPP (International Association of Privacy Professionals). Ms. Mitchell has represented clients in pro bono matters, including domestic violence restraining orders, prisoner rights', and immigration cases. She was the founding board president of the Family Violence Appellate Project, which advocates for survivors of domestic violence in appellate courts.

Mr. Murphy's practice focuses on complex commercial and class action litigation. He represents clients in state and federal courts and has defended a variety of clients in securities class actions, shareholder litigation, merger litigation, qui tam lawsuits including under the False Claims Act (FCA), and unfair competition and consumer fraud matters. His experience also includes representing companies in high-stakes internal investigations and government enforcement proceedings before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ). Mr. Murphy's experience extends to all aspects of litigation, including pleading attacks, discovery and related motion practice, class certification and summary judgment motions, and trial. He has represented clients in many industries, including banking, technology, fintech, crypto, retail, and consumer products, among others.
Description
As the first filing in a lawsuit, the complaint has several purposes and goals, but it will get dismissed if it does not show that the plaintiff's claim for relief is "plausible" as directed by Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009).
While this sounds easy, it can be difficult if not impossible in some of the most important types of lawsuits. Many a well-heeled firm has had complaints dismissed with prejudice because they could not state a "plausible" claim for relief.
Pleading a plausible and well-stated claim for relief requires hard work. Nothing hamstrings a young lawyer's reputation quite as easily as filing "shotgun" pleadings, which do little more than waste valuable attorney time and court resources.
Listen as this experienced panel of trial attorneys offers strategies and guidance for proper and competent pleading and how those on the receiving end can efficiently and effectively respond.
Outline
- Applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Twombly and Iqbal standards
- Problems with limited information
- Responding to inadequate or shotgun pleadings
- Recent cases
Benefits
The panel will review these and other essential topics:
- May courts sua sponte require a more definite statement of claims and defenses?
- Can inadequate pleading waive affirmative defenses?
- What strategies can be used when only general information is available and more discovery is needed to state claims or defenses?
Related Courses

Appellate Oral Argument: Philosophy, Preparation, Presentation, and Rebuttal
Monday, March 31, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Bullying in the Legal Profession: Ethical Standards Prohibiting Such Conduct and Reliable Ways to Counteract It
Friday, March 21, 2025
1:00 PM E.T.
Recommended Resources
Explore the Advantages of Consistent Legal Language
- Business & Professional Skills
- Talent Development
- Learning & Development