BarbriSFCourseDetails

Course Details

This CLE webinar will address the implications of ongoing CERCLA liability for potentially responsible parties (PRPs) given the EPA's 2024 guidance indicating that closed Superfund sites may be reopened (1) to address PFAS contamination and (2) due to reduced screening levels for lead-contaminated soil. The panel will address remedial measures that PRPs may want to take in advance of possible site reopening and discuss methods of mitigating risk including insurance considerations and language in consent decrees.

Faculty

Description

In 2024, EPA leadership indicated that the classification of certain PFAS chemicals as hazardous substances under CERCLA could lead to the agency's reopening of closed Superfund sites to address lingering PFAS contamination. Federal RD/RA judicial consent decrees now include reopener provisions that may be invoked to address PFAS contamination. The EPA conducts five-year reviews of consent decrees, potentially leading to additional remediation requirements. This increases the financial obligations for parties to consent decrees if reopeners are invoked due to PFAS regulations.

Additionally, in guidance that lowers recommended screening levels for investigating and cleaning up lead-contaminated soil in residential areas, the EPA stated that the guidance, effective Jan. 17, 2024, "should be considered for all residential lead sites subject to CERCLA [. . .] including those previously addressed and/or deleted from the National Priorities List."

The reopening of closed Superfund sites raises liability concerns for new PRPs who may be identified for those reopened sites and who may have little to no experience dealing with CERCLA liability and for previously identified PRPs who believed their liabilities were resolved. There are also insurance considerations where current policies may have certain environmental exclusions or where payouts have already occurred in prior settlements.

Counsel should understand the implications of reopened Superfund sites on their clients, remedial steps their clients may want to take in advance of any reopening, and possible measures to mitigate the impact through insurance coverage and consent decree terms.

Listen as our expert panel discusses the EPA's authority to reopen closed Superfund sites and under what circumstances it may do so. The panel will address the potential impact of reopening sites on former and new PRPs and offer best practices to mitigate risk.

Outline

I. Overview of CERCLA liability and settlement process

II. EPA's authority to reopen closed Superfund sites

A. PFAS hazardous substances designation

B. Reduced lead screening levels

III. Reopener liability

A. Consent decrees and reopener provisions

B. Five-year reviews and additional remediation requirements

C. Impact on PRPs

IV. Strategies

A. Insurance considerations

B. Consent decrees

C. Others

V. Practitioner takeaways

Benefits

The panel will review these and other important issues:

  • Under what circumstances may the EPA reopen closed Superfund sites? What recent developments may prompt reopening sites?
  • How may reopened Superfund sites impact former PRPs? New PRPs?
  • What remedial measures may PRPs take in advance of possible reopening?
  • What insurance considerations should counsel and their clients examine when faced with the possibility of a reopened Superfund site?
  • What are best practices for limiting liability and mitigating risk?